Characteristic not implies fully invariant in finite abelian group

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of a non-implication relation between two subgroup properties, when the big group is a finite abelian group. That is, it states that in a finite abelian group, every subgroup satisfying the first subgroup property (i.e., characteristic subgroup) need not satisfy the second subgroup property (i.e., fully invariant subgroup)
View all subgroup property non-implications | View all subgroup property implications

Statement

In a finite abelian group, a characteristic subgroup need not be a fully invariant subgroup.

Related facts

• Characteristic equals fully invariant in odd-order abelian group
• Characteristic not implies fully invariant in finitely generated abelian group
• Characteristic equals verbal in free abelian group

Proof

Let $G$ be the direct sum of the infinite cyclic group and the cyclic group of order two:

$G:=\mathbb{Z}/8\mathbb{Z}\oplus \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$.

Let $H$ be the cyclic subgroup of $G$ generated by $(2,1)$.

The subgroup is characteristic

Set:

$A:=\{g\in G\mid \mathrm{\exists }x\in G,4x=2g\}=\{(2r,s)\mid r\in \mathbb{Z}/8\mathbb{Z},s\in \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\}$

and

$B:=\{g\in G\mid \mathrm{\exists }x\in G,g=2x\}=\{(2r,0)\mid r\in \mathbb{Z}/8\mathbb{Z}\}$.

and:

$C:=\{g\in G\mid \mathrm{\exists }x\in G,8x=2g\}=\{(4r,s)\mid r\in \mathbb{Z}/8\mathbb{Z},s\in \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\}$.

Thus, we have:

$D:=A\setminus (B\cup C)=\{(2r,1)\mid r\in \mathbb{Z}/8\mathbb{Z},r\notin 2\mathbb{Z}/8\mathbb{Z}\}$.

Clearly, any automorphism of $G$ sends $A$ to itself, sends $B$ to itself, and sends $C$ to itself. Thus, any automorphism of $G$ sends $A\setminus (B\cup C)$ to itself. Thus, any automorphism of $G$ sends $D$ to itself. Note that $D$ comprises precisely those elements of $H$ that have the second coordinate equal to $1$: in particular, $(2,1)\in D\subseteq H$, so the subgroup generated by $D$ equals $H$. Thus, any automorphism of $G$ preserves $H$.

The subgroup is not fully invariant

Consider the map:

${\pi }_1:G\to G,{\pi }_1(a,b)=(a,0)$.

This map is an endomorphism of $G$, but the image of $(2,1)$ under this map is $(2,0)$, which is not an element of $H$. Thus, $H$ is not fully invariant in $G$.