Grand orthogonality theorem
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in linear representation theory.
View a complete list of basic facts in linear representation theory OR View all facts related to linear representation theory
This article describes an orthogonality theorem. View a list of orthogonality theorems
Statement
Statement over complex numbers
Suppose is a finite group. Let denote the field of complex numbers. For each equivalence class of irreducible linear representation of over , choose a basis such that the representation is unitary, i.e., the image lies inside . Now, consider the functions from to obtained as the matrix entries for these representations. (There are functions for each representation of degree ).
Consider the usual Hermitian inner product on the space of complex-valued functions on :
Then:
- The total number of functions arising from matrix entries equals the order of the group
- Any two such functions are orthogonal with respect to the inner product described above.
- The inner product of any matrix entry function with itself equals where is the degree of the representation from which it is picked.
Statement over general fields
Suppose is a finite group. Let be a splitting field for such that the characteristic of does not divide the order of . For every equivalence class of irreducible linear representation of over , choose a basis. Now consider the functions from to obtained as the matrix entries of these representations.
Consider the bilinear form for functions on the group:
Then:
- The total number of functions arising from matrix entries equals the order of the group
- Any two such functions are orthogonal with respect to the bilinear form described above.
- The inner product of any matrix entry function with itself equals where is the degree of the representation from which it is picked.
Related facts
Facts used
Proof
We first provide the proof using the bilinear form for general splitting fields, then discuss how this can be used to deduce the proof for the Hermitian inner product if we use unitary matrices over the complex numbers.
Proof of orthogonality of matrix entries from inequivalent irreducible representations
This part of the proof does not require the field to be a splitting field.
Given: A finite group , a field whose characteristic does not divide the order of . For functions define:
are inequivalent irreducible representations of over of degrees respectively.
Pick and ( are allowed to be equal to each other, are allowed to be equal to each other).
Define:
To prove:
Proof:
| Step no. | Assertion/construction | Facts used | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Denote by the matrix with a 1 in the entry and 0s elsewhere. | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| 2 | Define . is a matrix. | has degree , has degree , so the matrix multiplication makes sense. | Step (1) | -- | |
| 3 | is a homomorphism of representations from to | Step (2) | PLACEHOLDER FOR INFORMATION TO BE FILLED IN: [SHOW MORE] | ||
| 4 | is the zero matrix. | Fact (1) (note that the roles of are interchanged from the statement of Fact (1)) | are inequivalent irreducible representations. | Step (3) | |
| 5 | The entry of is zero. | Step (4) | |||
| 6 | The entry of equals . | Step (2) | Follows by simplifying the matrix multiplication. | ||
| 7 | , so . | Definitions of , inner product | Steps (5), (6) | Step-combination direct for first version, use definitions of for second version. |
Proof of orthonormality of distinct matrix entries from the same representation when the field is algebraically closed
We assume the field to be algebraically closed. After that, we will discuss why the result holds for other splitting fields.
Given: A finite group , an algebraically closed field whose characteristic does not divide the order of . For functions define:
is an irreducible representation of degree and are all elements of (with the restriction that ).
Define: