Finite-extensible implies inner

From Groupprops
Revision as of 12:43, 22 September 2009 by Vipul (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two automorphism properties. That is, it states that every automorphism satisfying the first automorphism property (i.e., finite-extensible automorphism) must also satisfy the second automorphism property (i.e., inner automorphism)
View all automorphism property implications | View all automorphism property non-implications
Get more facts about finite-extensible automorphism|Get more facts about inner automorphism

Statement

Suppose H is a finite group and σ is a finite-extensible automorphism of H: in other words, σ extends to an automorphism of G for any finite group G containing H. Then, σ is an inner automorphism of H.

Note that since any inner automorphism is extensible, this says that the property of being finite-extensible is equivalent to the property of being inner for a finite group.

Related facts

Weaker facts

Facts used

  1. Every finite group is the Fitting quotient of a p-dominated group for any prime p not dividing its order: Suppose H is a finite group and p is a prime not dividing the order of H. Then, there exists a p-dominated group G with H as Fitting quotient: in other words, there exists a finite complete group G such that the Fitting subgroup F(G) is a p-group, and H is a subgroup of G such that G=F(G)H.

Proof

Given: A finite group H, a finite-extensible automorphism σ of H.

To prove: σ is inner.

Proof: Let p be a prime not dividing the order of H. Consider the group G constructed by fact (1). Since σ is finite-extensible, σ extends to an automorphism σ of G. Further, since G is complete, there exists gG such that σ is conjugation by g.

Let ρ:GH be the retraction with kernel F(G). Note that conjugation by g preserves F(G), hence it induces a conjugation map on H as a quotient, namely, conjugation by the element ρ(g)H. However, since the restriction of ρ to the subgroup H is the identity map, we conclude that conjugation by g has the same effect on H as conjugation by ρ(g). In particular, σ equals conjugation by ρ(g), and hence is inner.

References

Journal references